These video's speak for themselves. Please share the link to the site.
http://declarationentertainment.com/
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Abomination?
God and His laws, is the answer! There is no doubt of that. As difficult as it can be at times, strive to hold fast to them. And if you should fall, pick yourself right back up, ask forgiveness and move on. So, let me ask you, how much truth do you find here?
Your Prayers?
By T. M. Moore, The Colson Center For Christian WorldviewPublished Date: October 30, 2010
Abominations (6)
If one turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination.
Proverbs 28:9
For many Christians, pointing out the abominations that abound in our society has become something of a spectator sport. We’re quick to point the finger at adulterers, homosexuals, corrupt businessmen, and tax cheats. We denounce with righteous indignation those who pursue practices which God describes as abominable and worthy of His wrath. But we’d better be careful here. Because it’s just possible that many of us are practicing a form of abomination which is, in the eyes of God, as heinous and detestable as any moral outrage we might choose to denounce. I’m talking about our prayers.
Scripture teaches that God has problems with the prayers of His people from time to time. Sometimes He’s actually angry at their prayers, as when they have become so compromised and shallow that they make themselves a taunt and laughing-stock among their unbelieving neighbors (Ps. 80:4-6). At other times He won’t listen to our prayers at all, particularly if we are holding on to some sin, refusing to repent and follow the path of righteousness (Ps. 66:18).
But is it really possible that God is not simply angry at our prayers or turns a deaf ear to them, but that He actually regards our prayers as in the same category as the kinds of abominations we have considered thus far? This is clearly the teaching of our text: God finds abominable the prayers of those who leave off hearing and obeying His Law.
Many Christians these days are hurling abominations in the face of God every time they look to Him in prayer. This is because the Law of God is held in such low esteem on the part of contemporary Christians. One well-known evangelical theologian has written that, “the Christian has no relationship to Law”, and for the Christian “the law is a dead and a useless thing.”
Many Christians are doubtless happy to hear that. Whenever I speak or write about the Law of God, I invariably hear from someone that “we’re not under Law, we’re under grace,” and, therefore, we don’t have to pay attention to the Law of God. Most Christians cannot name all the Ten Commandments in their proper order, and all but a few have any sense at all of what to do with the ancient civil laws of Israel – even though it is clear that Jesus and the Apostles regarded these as still in effect.
The neglect by the Christian community of the Law of God is the greatest scandal of our day. Yet, on top of this inexcusable neglect, our prayers go up day by day, not as sweet incense to the Lord, but as an abominable stench before His holy throne. God tells us in His Word that the truly righteous person meditates in the Law of God day by day, hides the Law of God in his heart, walks the path of God’s commandments like Jesus did, and teaches others to do the same (Ps. 1; Ps. 119:9-11; 1 Jn. 2:1-6: Matt. 5:17-19).
The Law of God is holy and righteous and good. But today’s Christians do not study the Law, do not teach it to one another, and do not insist that this holy and righteous and good standard of truth and justice should be part of the public policy of the land in which we live. Consequently, our prayers – and all you have to do is hear God’s Word on this – our prayers are an abominable stench in the nostrils of God.
Brothers and sisters, here is a call for repentance. Here is a call for you to add to your spiritual disciplines daily reading and meditation in the Commandments of God and the civil statues that accompany them. Here is a call, not to be saved by God’s Law, but to begin working out our salvation in those good works for which we have been redeemed, good works ordained from of old, as Paul puts it (Eph. 2:8-10). Here is a call, beloved, for purifying our prayers by turning again to the Law of God as the moral, spiritual, and ethical foundation for all our walk with Him.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
It's Time To Take The Bull By The Horns
Deemed too controversial in 1986 when the deficit was "only" $2 Trillion! Well, 4 administrations and 24 years later, we find the deficit to be $13 TRILLION! Think it'll still be too controversial? Maybe if the liberal media hadn't hidden this stuff from us 24 years ago, we'd be in a better position today. While there's no way to tell for sure, I believe we would be. It's time to take the bull by the horns, and wrestle this government to the ground once and for all. We the People must take our country back - or we might as well just move to Venezuela...
CAGW Launches New Nationwide Ad Campaign
On October 21, 2010, Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) unveiled a national ad addressing our country’s spending addiction, the dangers of relentless deficits, and the corrosive nature of our national debt.
This new ad, which features a chilling look at one potential future scenario if America continues on its current destructive fiscal trajectory, is a 2010 homage to “The Deficit Trials,” a 1986 ad that was produced by W.R. Grace & Co. For those who were able to view it, the ad caused a sensation; it was considered so controversial at the time that the networks refused to run it.
J. Peter Grace, CAGW’s co-founder and the chairman of President Ronald Reagan’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (the Grace Commission), was alarmed about what the debt would do to future generations. The national debt was $2 trillion in 1986, when “The Deficit Trials” ad was denied broadcast time; today the debt stands at $13.7 trillion and is projected to reach 140 percent of GDP in two decades, the time in which the new CAGW ad is set.
The new ad is part of an ongoing communications program in CAGW’s decades-long fight against wasteful government spending, increased taxes, out-of-control deficit spending, and a crippling national debt that threatens the future and survival of our country. CAGW plans to run the ad on major cable networks throughout the rest of 2010 and into 2011.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
CAGW Launches New Nationwide Ad Campaign
On October 21, 2010, Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) unveiled a national ad addressing our country’s spending addiction, the dangers of relentless deficits, and the corrosive nature of our national debt.
This new ad, which features a chilling look at one potential future scenario if America continues on its current destructive fiscal trajectory, is a 2010 homage to “The Deficit Trials,” a 1986 ad that was produced by W.R. Grace & Co. For those who were able to view it, the ad caused a sensation; it was considered so controversial at the time that the networks refused to run it.
J. Peter Grace, CAGW’s co-founder and the chairman of President Ronald Reagan’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (the Grace Commission), was alarmed about what the debt would do to future generations. The national debt was $2 trillion in 1986, when “The Deficit Trials” ad was denied broadcast time; today the debt stands at $13.7 trillion and is projected to reach 140 percent of GDP in two decades, the time in which the new CAGW ad is set.
The new ad is part of an ongoing communications program in CAGW’s decades-long fight against wasteful government spending, increased taxes, out-of-control deficit spending, and a crippling national debt that threatens the future and survival of our country. CAGW plans to run the ad on major cable networks throughout the rest of 2010 and into 2011.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Friday, October 29, 2010
Manipulating The Weather?
Interesting, but for what gain? To promote the global warming hoax? Hmmm...
<object width="640" height="385">
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
<object width="640" height="385">
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
I Wonder How Much Of This Will Be Going On This Year!
It's pretty sad when the most sacred duty/responsibility we have as citizens is wrought with fraud. This should anger every "normal" citizen, regardless of party affiliation or ideology. Keep your eyes open. Report what you find. Bring your camera phones and Flip movie cameras, and go to the polls with a buddy!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Don't Shy Away From Your Responsibility
Remember November! Elections DO have consequences. VOTE!
Remember November: The Final Act from Republican Governors Association on Vimeo.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Remember November: The Final Act from Republican Governors Association on Vimeo.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
I'm 63 And I'm Tired
Yes, I'm d--- tired. But I'm also glad to be 63. Because, mostly, I'm not going to have to see the world these people are making. I'm just sorry for my granddaughter.. 
by Robert A. Hall
Robert A. Hall is the actor who plays the coroner on CSI if you watch that show.He is also a Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms in the Massachusetts State Senate.
I'm 63. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting every day, I've worked, hard, since I was 18. Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven't called in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn't inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there's no retirement in sight, and I'm tired. Very tired.
I'm tired of being told that I have to pay more taxes to "keep people in their homes." Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I'm willing to help. But if they bought McMansions at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble help them with their own money.
I'm tired of being told how bad America is by left-wing millionaires like Michael Moore, George Soros and Hollywood Entertainers who live in luxury because of the opportunities America offers. In thirty years, if they get their way, the United States will have the economy of Zimbabwe, the freedom of the press of China, the crime and violence of Mexico, the tolerance for Christian people of Iran, and the freedom of speech of Venezuela.
I'm tired of being told that "race doesn't matter" in the post-racial world of Obama, when it's all that matters in affirmative action jobs, lower college admission and graduation standards for minorities (harming them the most), government contract set-asides, tolerance for the ghetto culture of violence and fatherless children that hurts minorities more than anyone, and in the appointment of U.S. Senators from Illinois.
I'm tired of being told I must lower my living standard to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate. My wife and I live in a two-bedroom apartment and carpool together five miles to our jobs. We also own a three-bedroom condo where our daughter and granddaughter live. Our carbon footprint is about 5% of Al Gore's, and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough.
I'm tired of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses while they tried to fight it off? I don't think Gay people choose to be Gay, but I damn sure think druggies chose to take drugs. And I'm tired of harassment from cool people treating me like a freak when I tell them I never tried marijuana.
I'm tired of illegal aliens being called "undocumented workers," especially the ones who aren't working, but are living on welfare or crime. What's next? Calling drug dealers, "Undocumented Pharmacists"? And, no, I'm not against Hispanics. Most of them are Catholic, and it's been a few hundred years since Catholics wanted to kill me for my religion. I'm willing to fast track for citizenship any Hispanic person, who can speak English, doesn't have a criminal record and who is self-supporting without family on welfare, or who serves honourably for three years in our military.... Those are the citizens we need.
I'm tired of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and politicians of both parties talking about innocent mistakes, stupid mistakes or youthful mistakes, when we all know they think their only mistake was getting caught. I'm tired of people with a sense of entitlement, rich or poor.
Speaking of poor, I'm tired of hearing people with air-conditioned homes, colour TVs and two cars called poor. The majority of Americans didn't have that in 1970, but we didn't know we were "poor." The poverty pimps have to keep changing the definition of poor to keep the dollars flowing.
I'm real tired of people who don't take responsibility for their lives and actions. I'm tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination or big-whatever for their problems.
Yes, I'm d--- tired. But I'm also glad to be 63. Because, mostly, I'm not going to have to see the world these people are making. I'm just sorry for my granddaughter..
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
It's Time For The People To Demand Change In Washington
Get on board...
Congressional Reform Act of 2010
1. Term Limits.
A maximum of 12 years only, one of the possible options below...
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
2. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.
The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.
Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Congressional Reform Act of 2010
1. Term Limits.
A maximum of 12 years only, one of the possible options below...
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
2. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.
The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.
Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight For Both!
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
99er's Are Being Unionized
The number of "99ers" - people who have been unemployed for 99 weeks or longer has skyrocketed since 2007. I understand it is at its highest number in our history. We have closed over 42,000 factories since 2001. There is no "light at the end of the tunnel" for many of these people. Most have worked their entire lives, only to find when their benefits run out they may end up homeless, penniless, destitute. And things are getting worse because the current administration embraces policies in direct opposition to free market principles. No free market, no jobs.
So has there been anything nefarious in the administrations complicity in growing this "class" of Americans? Absolutely. And now we're seeing what it is. The union, you know, obama's buddies, have stepped in and unionized the 99er's. Hmmm, another lobbying bloc! Is it a stretch to predict this group will lobby Congress to extend unemployment benefits even longer? Can you say a permanent socialist class of Americans if that ever happens? And which ever party agrees to those "demands" for increased benefits will undoubtedly get the benefit of a huge voting constituency - upwards of 7.5 million people, all voting age - by some accounts.That will undoubtedly be the Democrats, and the progressive ship will keep sailing on.
Is there no end to the fronts on which we will need to fight in order to turn this national travesty around and restore liberty? I think not. The progressives have shown their hand and their willingness to openly engage in the struggle to change America. They know they will either be strong enough to make that happen, or they will fail. Seeing as they are out in the open, it's clear they believe they are strong enough to succeed in their mission. Have they under-estimated us? I pray they have. But I still see too many apathetic people walking around in their own little world with little regard, or understanding, of the magnitude of the challenge facing America. How that can be, I'm not quite sure, but none-the-less it is evident everywhere I look.
Engage people, get them out to the polls, make them understand the issues that are clearly visible in our society. They are many, and they are huge in scope. The magnitude is nearly unfathomable when you stop to think about it. The sheer scope of the work ahead is overwhelming. But as Ronald Reagan once said, "If not us, who? If not now, when?" That is exactly where we stand today. That is exactly the place in history we find ourselves. Our response, how we react, the choices we make, and the strength we share, will ultimately define what is written about this generation of Americans in future history books. We've looked back in history at "the greatest generation", but their challenges, while great, were not as great as ours. Let's work tirelessly to take that designation from them!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight!
So has there been anything nefarious in the administrations complicity in growing this "class" of Americans? Absolutely. And now we're seeing what it is. The union, you know, obama's buddies, have stepped in and unionized the 99er's. Hmmm, another lobbying bloc! Is it a stretch to predict this group will lobby Congress to extend unemployment benefits even longer? Can you say a permanent socialist class of Americans if that ever happens? And which ever party agrees to those "demands" for increased benefits will undoubtedly get the benefit of a huge voting constituency - upwards of 7.5 million people, all voting age - by some accounts.That will undoubtedly be the Democrats, and the progressive ship will keep sailing on.
Is there no end to the fronts on which we will need to fight in order to turn this national travesty around and restore liberty? I think not. The progressives have shown their hand and their willingness to openly engage in the struggle to change America. They know they will either be strong enough to make that happen, or they will fail. Seeing as they are out in the open, it's clear they believe they are strong enough to succeed in their mission. Have they under-estimated us? I pray they have. But I still see too many apathetic people walking around in their own little world with little regard, or understanding, of the magnitude of the challenge facing America. How that can be, I'm not quite sure, but none-the-less it is evident everywhere I look.
Engage people, get them out to the polls, make them understand the issues that are clearly visible in our society. They are many, and they are huge in scope. The magnitude is nearly unfathomable when you stop to think about it. The sheer scope of the work ahead is overwhelming. But as Ronald Reagan once said, "If not us, who? If not now, when?" That is exactly where we stand today. That is exactly the place in history we find ourselves. Our response, how we react, the choices we make, and the strength we share, will ultimately define what is written about this generation of Americans in future history books. We've looked back in history at "the greatest generation", but their challenges, while great, were not as great as ours. Let's work tirelessly to take that designation from them!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty, And Prepare To Fight!
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Let's Discuss Separation Of Church And State...
I received an email today (recreated below) that prompted me to think about this question. When I researched to find out if the email represented fact, I found that it did. And then I began asking myself some questions. Here's the email.
So what "particular religion" was the writer referring to? Was Jody McLeod promoting Catholic religion? Protestant? Jewish? Mormon? Baptist? Jesuit? Lutheran? Which one? You see, the Constitution doesn't contrive to separate God from us, Only people have done that. The Constitution only contrives to prevent the government from imposing, with no choice, a certain religion on the people. When the founders created the Constitution they were aware of Allah and Buddha. They were aware of Ra and Zeus and all the other Greek and Egyptian gods. So if they were intent on eliminating any influence of a god on society, why did they add God into the founding documents? Why not be all-inclusive and add Allah and Buddha, and all the gods of the past, into the text? Because they were not interested in being inclusive. They understood that we would need a moral compass in which to navigate our existence if we were to survive. They believed that moral compass could be found in God, and it worked well for America until 1962. So what changed?
Although there had been attempts throughout our short history, it wasn't until 1962, in a Supreme Court decision in the Engel vs. Vitale case, that the assault on God in America took root. Until that time the Supreme Court ruled that matters of religion were matters for the state. It's interesting to note that the 1962 Supreme Court decision coincides with the beginning of America's social, moral, intellectual, and economic decline that brought us to the point we find ourselves today - in a fight to preserve liberty and freedom, or to slither into the socialist morass that engulfs many other countries.
If we don't insist that the Supreme Court stop "interpreting" the constitution and instead reverse obviously erroneous and ignorant decisions of the past 50 years, they are going to continue to legislate from the bench and we are all going to be in more serious trouble than we find ourselves today. Who would have thought that could be possible? The job of the Supreme Court is to tell us if something is Constitutional - period. Not to interpret based on individual ideology of the judges.
And we better legislate God back into every facet of our society soon by reversing past decisions, or our nation of freedom and liberty will be lost for good. The Federal Government and the Supreme Court will see to that. Stand up folks. Find the truth inside yourself. Do you believe in God? Do you need God? If the answer is yes, then you better be prepared to fight, because the battle of good vs evil is in full engagement. Believe it, or not. Time is short in terms of the window left open to us to recapture an America based on Christian values and liberty.
If you're good with letting the government take care of the masses, something clearly not intended by the founders; if your good with accepting the Constitution as a living document, something else clearly not intended by the founders, then please take the time to pack and get the hell out of America! We don't need or want you here any longer. Your way of thinking, and the men and women who believe that same way and who have acted on those beliefs, have done enough damage to our country.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
This is a statement that was read over the PA system at the football game at Roane County High School , Kingston , Tennessee by school Principal, Jody McLeod
"It has always been the custom at Roane County High School football games, to say a prayer and play the National Anthem, to honor God and Country."
Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, I am told that saying a Prayer is a violation of Federal Case Law. As I understand the law at this time, I can use this public facility to approve of sexual perversion and call it "an alternate life style," and if someone is offended, that's OK.
I can use it to condone sexual promiscuity, by dispensing condoms and calling it, "safe sex." If someone is offended, that's OK.
I can even use this public facility to present the merits of killing an unborn baby as a "viable! means of birth control." If someone is offended, no problem...
I can designate a school day as "Earth Day" and involve students in activities to worship religiously and praise the goddess "Mother Earth" and call it "ecology.."
I can use literature, videos and presentations in the classroom that depicts people with strong, traditional Christian convictions as "simple minded" and "ignorant" and call it "enlightenment.."
However, if anyone uses this facility to honor GOD and to ask HIM to Bless this event with safety and good sportsmanship, then Federal Case Law is violated.
This appears to be inconsistent at best, and at worst, diabolical.
Apparently, we are to be tolerant of everything and anyone, except GOD and HIS Commandments.
Nevertheless , as a school principal, I frequently ask staff and students to abide by rules with which they do not necessarily agree. For me to do otherwise would be inconsistent at best, and at worst, hypocritical... I suffer from that affliction enough unintentionally. I certainly do not need to add an intentional transgression.
For this reason, I shall "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's," and refrain from praying at this time.
" However, if you feel inspired to honor, praise and thank GOD and ask HIM,in the name of JESUS, to Bless this event, please feel free to do so.. As far as I know, that's not against the law----yet."
One by one, the people in the stands bowed their heads, held hands with one another and began to pray.
They prayed in the stands. They prayed in the team huddles. They prayed at the concession stand and they prayed in the Announcer's Box!
The only place they didn't pray was in the Supreme Court of the United States of America- the Seat of "Justice" in the "one nation, under GOD."
Somehow, Kingston , Tennessee Remembered what so many have forgotten. We are given the Freedom OF Religion, not the Freedom FROM Religion. Praise GOD that HIS remnant remains!
JESUS said, "If you are ashamed of ME before men, then I will be ashamed of you before MY FATHER.."
When I began researching the validity of this email I ran across a thread where a comment indicated the writer could not condone Jody McLeod's actions, claiming that "I do NOT endorse this lady. I cannot agree with the backdoor attempts to promote a particular religion to a captive audience (children, no less), especially from a bully pulpit of authority at a public school funded with public money."
So what "particular religion" was the writer referring to? Was Jody McLeod promoting Catholic religion? Protestant? Jewish? Mormon? Baptist? Jesuit? Lutheran? Which one? You see, the Constitution doesn't contrive to separate God from us, Only people have done that. The Constitution only contrives to prevent the government from imposing, with no choice, a certain religion on the people. When the founders created the Constitution they were aware of Allah and Buddha. They were aware of Ra and Zeus and all the other Greek and Egyptian gods. So if they were intent on eliminating any influence of a god on society, why did they add God into the founding documents? Why not be all-inclusive and add Allah and Buddha, and all the gods of the past, into the text? Because they were not interested in being inclusive. They understood that we would need a moral compass in which to navigate our existence if we were to survive. They believed that moral compass could be found in God, and it worked well for America until 1962. So what changed?
Although there had been attempts throughout our short history, it wasn't until 1962, in a Supreme Court decision in the Engel vs. Vitale case, that the assault on God in America took root. Until that time the Supreme Court ruled that matters of religion were matters for the state. It's interesting to note that the 1962 Supreme Court decision coincides with the beginning of America's social, moral, intellectual, and economic decline that brought us to the point we find ourselves today - in a fight to preserve liberty and freedom, or to slither into the socialist morass that engulfs many other countries.
If we don't insist that the Supreme Court stop "interpreting" the constitution and instead reverse obviously erroneous and ignorant decisions of the past 50 years, they are going to continue to legislate from the bench and we are all going to be in more serious trouble than we find ourselves today. Who would have thought that could be possible? The job of the Supreme Court is to tell us if something is Constitutional - period. Not to interpret based on individual ideology of the judges.
And we better legislate God back into every facet of our society soon by reversing past decisions, or our nation of freedom and liberty will be lost for good. The Federal Government and the Supreme Court will see to that. Stand up folks. Find the truth inside yourself. Do you believe in God? Do you need God? If the answer is yes, then you better be prepared to fight, because the battle of good vs evil is in full engagement. Believe it, or not. Time is short in terms of the window left open to us to recapture an America based on Christian values and liberty.
If you're good with letting the government take care of the masses, something clearly not intended by the founders; if your good with accepting the Constitution as a living document, something else clearly not intended by the founders, then please take the time to pack and get the hell out of America! We don't need or want you here any longer. Your way of thinking, and the men and women who believe that same way and who have acted on those beliefs, have done enough damage to our country.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
Monday, October 18, 2010
Get Radical, Or Get Lost
As the country plummets deeper and deeper into debt, the need to review and revamp entitlement programs has never been greater. And yet, politicians on both sides of the aisle refuse to touch that hot potato for fear of the political repercussions. For social security in particular there is a pretty easy solution. Phase it out, raise the retirement age incrementally over time, and provide motivation for people below the age of 45 to start personal retirement accounts. What's the problem? As a 53 year old I know that may include some things I don't like. Maybe I won't be able to "collect" until I'm 65, 67 or 68 instead of 62. Ok, so be it. The alternative is that at some point in the future no one will be able to "collect" and they also won't be prepared with personal retirement accounts.
We have politicians who relish the tactic of fearmongering. Whoever they can scare into voting their way, they will. Doesn't matter to them what's right for the country, or even if what they tell you is truthful. It only matters that the tactic can be used to get re-elected and increase their power. Politics in Washington isn't just broken, it's not just corrupt, it is a huge Ponzi scheme, a house of cards waiting to crumble. Read Saving Freedom by Jim DeMint, then get out and VOTE the corruption out of Washington. That may mean taking a hard look at your Senators or your Representative. But if they are not complying with the Oath they took, they need to go - pure and simple. Get on board!
Social Security Reform: The New Radicalism
By Joseph C. Phillips
10/18/2010
There is, perhaps, no better testament to how far this nation has drifted from the principles of individual liberty, free markets, and private property than that those proponents of real reform of the Social Security system are now looked upon as radicals.
Senate majority leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), running for his political life, accused his opponent, Sharron Angle, of wanting to “kill Social Security.” Of course, Harry Reid has a rather elastic definition of “the truth,” so his attack lacks a measure of veracity. Angle has taken the position that in order to save Social Security we must stop raiding the (non-existent) lock-box and that “going forward, we need to personalize Social Security the same way that Harry Reid has a personalized account.” Reid has routinely characterized Angle as an extremist. Alas, Reid also suffers from the political malady known as “Venetian memory:” Recalling that which is advantageous and forgetting everything else. You see, in 1999 Harry Reid was all for “putting a small amount of Social Security dollars into the private sector.”
What is also interesting is how fast Angle changed the subject. And who can blame her? Democrat warnings that Republicans want to roll the dice with the retirements of the elderly have been extremely effective. Republicans running for office must distance themselves from the topic of Social Security reform, lest they commit political suicide.
Unfortunately, such scare tactics have also scuttled any hope for finding a real solution to the very real problem of securing the financial future of the Social Security system.
This year, Social Security went into deficit; the program is paying out more than it is taking in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this deficit will continue for the next four years, “with small surpluses reappearing briefly in 2014 and 2015.” The report continues: “After that, demographic forces are expected to overtake the fund, as more and more baby boomers leave the work force, stop paying into the program and start collecting their benefits. At that point, outlays will exceed revenue every year, no matter how well the economy performs.”
To this happy news, progressives shout that privatization, which really means giving private citizens ownership and control of their Social Security dollars, will lead to disaster. Such pronouncements are really an example of the old political game of saying one thing while doing another. In neighborhoods outside of Washington, D.C., this is also known as lying.
In order to stave off the impending collapse of the system, Congress must either raise taxes, raise the age of retirement, cut services, implement means testing for recipients, or some combination thereof.
In other words, in order to get votes, liberal politicians are convincing citizens that conservatives want to take away their retirement savings. Once in office, those same Democrat politicians will pass laws that will take Social Security away from large swaths of the American public.
As it happens, there is also another way to save Social Security: import workers. In addition to the potential of providing Democrats with several million new voters, “comprehensive immigration reform,” (or amnesty), would also add millions of new workers to pay into the Social Security system. The idea of importing workers to sustain entitlement programs is not new. France buoyed its social welfare programs by importing millions of North Africans; Americans can sustain its entitlement programs by looking south of the border. And like France, we might also look forward to millions of citizens rioting in the streets when the financial rubber finally hits the road. But I digress.
The great irony is that what conservatives are really saying is that workers should be allowed to own the fruits of their labor. What a radical concept!
Actually, it turns out that it’s not all that radical. You see, there are approximately six million state and municipal employees, including policemen, firemen, and school teachers that have been able to opt out of the Social Security system. In fact, prior to 1984, federal employees did not participate in the system. In an effort to shore up the system, federal employees were brought into the fold. That process was vehemently opposed by none other than that old radical, then-Congressman, Harry Reid.
My, how times have changed!
Joseph C. Phillips is the author of “He Talk Like A White Boy” available wherever books are sold.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
We have politicians who relish the tactic of fearmongering. Whoever they can scare into voting their way, they will. Doesn't matter to them what's right for the country, or even if what they tell you is truthful. It only matters that the tactic can be used to get re-elected and increase their power. Politics in Washington isn't just broken, it's not just corrupt, it is a huge Ponzi scheme, a house of cards waiting to crumble. Read Saving Freedom by Jim DeMint, then get out and VOTE the corruption out of Washington. That may mean taking a hard look at your Senators or your Representative. But if they are not complying with the Oath they took, they need to go - pure and simple. Get on board!
Social Security Reform: The New Radicalism
By Joseph C. Phillips
10/18/2010
There is, perhaps, no better testament to how far this nation has drifted from the principles of individual liberty, free markets, and private property than that those proponents of real reform of the Social Security system are now looked upon as radicals.
Senate majority leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), running for his political life, accused his opponent, Sharron Angle, of wanting to “kill Social Security.” Of course, Harry Reid has a rather elastic definition of “the truth,” so his attack lacks a measure of veracity. Angle has taken the position that in order to save Social Security we must stop raiding the (non-existent) lock-box and that “going forward, we need to personalize Social Security the same way that Harry Reid has a personalized account.” Reid has routinely characterized Angle as an extremist. Alas, Reid also suffers from the political malady known as “Venetian memory:” Recalling that which is advantageous and forgetting everything else. You see, in 1999 Harry Reid was all for “putting a small amount of Social Security dollars into the private sector.”
What is also interesting is how fast Angle changed the subject. And who can blame her? Democrat warnings that Republicans want to roll the dice with the retirements of the elderly have been extremely effective. Republicans running for office must distance themselves from the topic of Social Security reform, lest they commit political suicide.
Unfortunately, such scare tactics have also scuttled any hope for finding a real solution to the very real problem of securing the financial future of the Social Security system.
This year, Social Security went into deficit; the program is paying out more than it is taking in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this deficit will continue for the next four years, “with small surpluses reappearing briefly in 2014 and 2015.” The report continues: “After that, demographic forces are expected to overtake the fund, as more and more baby boomers leave the work force, stop paying into the program and start collecting their benefits. At that point, outlays will exceed revenue every year, no matter how well the economy performs.”
To this happy news, progressives shout that privatization, which really means giving private citizens ownership and control of their Social Security dollars, will lead to disaster. Such pronouncements are really an example of the old political game of saying one thing while doing another. In neighborhoods outside of Washington, D.C., this is also known as lying.
In order to stave off the impending collapse of the system, Congress must either raise taxes, raise the age of retirement, cut services, implement means testing for recipients, or some combination thereof.
In other words, in order to get votes, liberal politicians are convincing citizens that conservatives want to take away their retirement savings. Once in office, those same Democrat politicians will pass laws that will take Social Security away from large swaths of the American public.
As it happens, there is also another way to save Social Security: import workers. In addition to the potential of providing Democrats with several million new voters, “comprehensive immigration reform,” (or amnesty), would also add millions of new workers to pay into the Social Security system. The idea of importing workers to sustain entitlement programs is not new. France buoyed its social welfare programs by importing millions of North Africans; Americans can sustain its entitlement programs by looking south of the border. And like France, we might also look forward to millions of citizens rioting in the streets when the financial rubber finally hits the road. But I digress.
The great irony is that what conservatives are really saying is that workers should be allowed to own the fruits of their labor. What a radical concept!
Actually, it turns out that it’s not all that radical. You see, there are approximately six million state and municipal employees, including policemen, firemen, and school teachers that have been able to opt out of the Social Security system. In fact, prior to 1984, federal employees did not participate in the system. In an effort to shore up the system, federal employees were brought into the fold. That process was vehemently opposed by none other than that old radical, then-Congressman, Harry Reid.
My, how times have changed!
Joseph C. Phillips is the author of “He Talk Like A White Boy” available wherever books are sold.
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Read This! And The (Socialism) Beat Goes On...And On...And On...
EXCLUSIVE! Democratic Party Coordinates With European Socialists In Bid For “Global New Deal”
Posted by Asst Natl Dir Mellie
October 14, 2009
Is it too much to ask that before the Democratic Party sells America out to the European Socialist movement, they at least enlighten the average American citizen as to their actions?
What are we talking about?
Over the past few years, the highest ranking officials from the Democrat party have been working strategically to advance something called a “Global New Deal” based on Progressive-Democratic-Socialism.
Read the entire article, see pictures and video, all right here.
So there you have it. Overwhelming circumstantial evidence that our Democratic party and leadership have been planning a global new deal and a sharp left turn toward Socialism, with help and coordination from foreign powers.
Were you planning on sitting the coming elections out? I hope you reconsider. We have a Party in America who is actively engaged in destroying American Freedom. And regardless what rhetoric they spew, the facts, if researched, will speak for themselves. Don't listen to what they say, look at what they do and what they have done! And then you say NO to democrats. Let's get rid of the Democrat Party, and expel any/every progressive member in Congress and indeed in all of government, starting November 2nd!!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
Posted by Asst Natl Dir Mellie
October 14, 2009
Is it too much to ask that before the Democratic Party sells America out to the European Socialist movement, they at least enlighten the average American citizen as to their actions?
What are we talking about?
Over the past few years, the highest ranking officials from the Democrat party have been working strategically to advance something called a “Global New Deal” based on Progressive-Democratic-Socialism.
Read the entire article, see pictures and video, all right here.
So there you have it. Overwhelming circumstantial evidence that our Democratic party and leadership have been planning a global new deal and a sharp left turn toward Socialism, with help and coordination from foreign powers.
Were you planning on sitting the coming elections out? I hope you reconsider. We have a Party in America who is actively engaged in destroying American Freedom. And regardless what rhetoric they spew, the facts, if researched, will speak for themselves. Don't listen to what they say, look at what they do and what they have done! And then you say NO to democrats. Let's get rid of the Democrat Party, and expel any/every progressive member in Congress and indeed in all of government, starting November 2nd!!
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
Don't Count Your Chickens
We still have more than two weeks before election day. Many of you, like me, have been watching the polls. Over many weeks those polls have shown that Republicans have a decided edge in gaining seats in Congress. Some pundits, especially Dick Morris with his prediction of close to 100 seats, claim that a "republican tsunami" is about to hit the political landscape. Don't believe it. The progressives haven't gotten where they are by underestimating their competition - Conservative America.
There has already been a massive move to get out early voters in many states by the Democrat Party. That is one intentional strategy they employ so that on election night, as exit poll info is broadcast, those polls will lean significantly towards the Republicans. This strategy is designed to create 'voter apathy' in the western half of the nation as the day wears on, creating lower than expected voter turnout and hopefully, a Democrat win in many of the elections across those states.
Where ever you are, continue to impress the importance of voting regardless of what the media claims the vote totals may be. There is no reason to trust the media any longer, so don't listen to them. Press your friends and family to get to the polls. Drive them there if you have to. Ensure that elderly people you know also get to the polls; again, drive them if necessary. I would suggest that every conservative American who can get it off, put in for election as a vacation day. If you don't have anyone to drive, then stay at the polls and be a poll-watcher. This is the strategy we need to employ over the next 10 election cycles (minimum) to ensure there is no voter fraud going on, and that everyone who can vote does vote.
Stay engaged. Do not become disappointed or disillusioned if the results of November 2nd don't mirror your expectations. Continue to press forward with our initiatives as conservative Americans. It took decades for us to get into this mess, and it will take decades for us to get out. Stay the course...
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
There has already been a massive move to get out early voters in many states by the Democrat Party. That is one intentional strategy they employ so that on election night, as exit poll info is broadcast, those polls will lean significantly towards the Republicans. This strategy is designed to create 'voter apathy' in the western half of the nation as the day wears on, creating lower than expected voter turnout and hopefully, a Democrat win in many of the elections across those states.
Where ever you are, continue to impress the importance of voting regardless of what the media claims the vote totals may be. There is no reason to trust the media any longer, so don't listen to them. Press your friends and family to get to the polls. Drive them there if you have to. Ensure that elderly people you know also get to the polls; again, drive them if necessary. I would suggest that every conservative American who can get it off, put in for election as a vacation day. If you don't have anyone to drive, then stay at the polls and be a poll-watcher. This is the strategy we need to employ over the next 10 election cycles (minimum) to ensure there is no voter fraud going on, and that everyone who can vote does vote.
Stay engaged. Do not become disappointed or disillusioned if the results of November 2nd don't mirror your expectations. Continue to press forward with our initiatives as conservative Americans. It took decades for us to get into this mess, and it will take decades for us to get out. Stay the course...
Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)