Here is the list of Republican Senators who are part of the progressive problem facing America. The worst offenders are at the top of the list. Do your research, but in my opinion they should ALL be voted out!
Susan Collins (ME)
Olympia Snowe (ME)
Kit Bond (MO)
Judd Gregg (NH)
George Voinovich (OH)
Bob Corker (TN)
Lamar Alexander (TN)
Richard Lugar (IN)
John Barrasso (WY)
Mike Enzi (WY)
John Kyl (AZ)
John McCain (AZ)
John Ensign (NV)
Kay Bailey Hutchinson (TX)
Lisa Murkowski (AK)
Tom Coburn (OK)
George LeMieux (FL)- He's only been in the Senate for about two months!!!
The following Republicans also have voted for progressive measures, but to a lesser degree. So if there are more conservative candidates running, consider voting for them, and voting these individuals into retirement!
Jeff Sessions (AL)
Mitch McConnell (KY)
Lindsay Graham (SC)
Robert Bennett UT)
Orin Hatch (UT)
Richard Shelby (AL)
Jim Risch (ID)
Mike Crapo (ID)
Thad Cochran (MS)
John Thune (SD)
Roger Wicker (MS)
Jim DeMint (SC)
David Vitter (LA)
Only these individuals have been true to the values and principles of conservative America! Hmmm, Georgia's on my mind...
Saxby Chmabliss (GA)
Johnny Isakson (GA)
Charles Grassley (IA)
Pat Roberts (KS)
Sam Brownback (KS)
Jim Bunning (KY)
Richard Burr (NC)
Mike Johanns (NE)
James Inhofe (OK)
John Cornyn (TX)
Wake Up America!
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Don't Get Confused
There are a lot of political pundits on TV espousing the theory that the Republican Party is on the verge of a resurgence. Even Newt Gingrich, possibly the smartest pundit out there, is publicly stating this. But I contend that a Republican Party resurgence would be a by-product of a Conservative resurgence. For it is conservatives who have mobilized, and conservatives who will flock to the polls come 2010. It is Conservatives who will run against progressive ideologues in both major parties. So please, don't be confused once 2010 comes and goes, and 2012 looms on the horizon. Don't vote the Party. Forget the labels. Vote the most conservative candidate available in every race in your area. That is the only way to reverse this disastrous course we are on. God Bless America!
Wake Up America!
Wake Up America!
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Chameleon-In-Chief
Have you spent any time really listening to what our esteemed (hm,hm, throat clearing) leader really says? It's hard to comprehend what he actually stands for because he contradicts himself all the time, and he's a master of semantics. He's for a single-payer system in one speech, he's never claimed to be for a single payer system in another speech. He's for free speech and a challenging exchange of ideas, but if you made the mess" shut up and get out of the way so he can mop it up. He's for a unified nation, but divisive in his comments - demonizing individuals and groups weekly, sometimes daily. His vision of "presidential" is lacking in substance, character, and depth. He is a shell, mostly making decisions by the seat of his pants. Oh no, that can't be right. He claims he's being very deliberate with his decisions! Yeah? Was a stimulus package that needed to be passed before anyone voting on it could read it being deliberate? Was pushing Cap & Trade through the House before anyone could read it being deliberate? Was trying to push Health Care Reform and a government option through Congress prior to the August recess, and before anyone could read it, being deliberate? Oh yeah, I guess once again I forgot this guy is all about semantics. And when he says he is acting deliberately he is doing just that. But he doesn't mean "with caution and great thought". He means "with intention". He means he is deliberately working to fundamentally change America forever.
Wake Up America!!
Wake Up America!!
How Do You Hold A Country Together?
There was a time when America welcomed legal immigrants with open arms, but at the same time expected those individuals to assimilate themselves into the American culture. They were required to have a sponsor, and learn the language. Today it's much different.
To start, just press one to read the rest of this message in Spanish. Yep, that will motivate everyone to learn the language and help the newcomers to meld into our culture and society, won't it! That in itself is divisive and threatens the long-term prosperity of our nation. It fosters subtle racial tension, whether it means to or not. It does not promote a "united" nation. But much worse than that is the fact that we are vacillating between upholding the laws of our country vs. the laws of other cultures. The two can be mutually exclusive, so what do we do?
For instance, Sharia Law allows for fathers to behead their daughters and wives for specific "offenses" against the Muslim religion. So when that culturally accepted practice of the Muslim religion conflicts with our law of murder, given today's progressively ideological courts, who wins at trial? How is it resolved?
Wouldn't it be much cleaner and much more widely understood by everyone if America just maintained that if you come here, you must have a sponsor and you must assimilate yourself into our culture. There will be no more "diversity" acceptance; it just fragments the country and blurs the lines of law. You will be required to learn English - period. You will be required to learn our history. You will be required to accept our culture - after all, you're coming to our country, we're not going to yours.
The country is becoming more and more fragmented year by year! It's what our elected politicians want, because it keeps them in power - at least up to now. Something must be done to stop the erosion, and then reverse it!
Wake Up America!
To start, just press one to read the rest of this message in Spanish. Yep, that will motivate everyone to learn the language and help the newcomers to meld into our culture and society, won't it! That in itself is divisive and threatens the long-term prosperity of our nation. It fosters subtle racial tension, whether it means to or not. It does not promote a "united" nation. But much worse than that is the fact that we are vacillating between upholding the laws of our country vs. the laws of other cultures. The two can be mutually exclusive, so what do we do?
For instance, Sharia Law allows for fathers to behead their daughters and wives for specific "offenses" against the Muslim religion. So when that culturally accepted practice of the Muslim religion conflicts with our law of murder, given today's progressively ideological courts, who wins at trial? How is it resolved?
Wouldn't it be much cleaner and much more widely understood by everyone if America just maintained that if you come here, you must have a sponsor and you must assimilate yourself into our culture. There will be no more "diversity" acceptance; it just fragments the country and blurs the lines of law. You will be required to learn English - period. You will be required to learn our history. You will be required to accept our culture - after all, you're coming to our country, we're not going to yours.
The country is becoming more and more fragmented year by year! It's what our elected politicians want, because it keeps them in power - at least up to now. Something must be done to stop the erosion, and then reverse it!
Wake Up America!
Friday, October 23, 2009
More On The Right Wing Arm Of The Progressive Movement
To support my post "The Impersonators", below, today there is a report out of New York - I believe the 23rd District - regarding the congressional race going on there. It seems that the Republicans have two candidates running. One - Doug Hoffman - is a conservative who has been endorsed, and financially backed, by Sarah Palin and her PAC. The other - Dierdre Scozzafava - is LEFT of Obama on some issues. The GOP has endorsed Scozzafava! Yep, the GOP is definitely the right-wing arm of the progressive movement. Watch out America! Take notice of what the "Republican Party" really represents. It's certainly NOT conservatism!
Wake Up America!!!
Wake Up America!!!
This Is Patriotism! God Bless America! God Bless Our Troops!!!
WHEN THE MUSIC STOPPED
To understand this story, you need to know that, in military theaters, the National Anthem is played before every movie.
This was written by Chaplain Jim Higgins, who is stationed in Iraq:
I recently attended a showing of "Superman 3" here at LSA Anaconda (an American base camp north of Baghdad). We have a large auditorium we use for movies, as well as memorial services and other large gatherings. As is the custom back in the States, we stood and snapped to attention when the National Anthem began before the main feature. All was going as planned until about three-quarters of the way through The National Anthem the music stopped.
Now, what would happen if this occurred with 1,000 18-22 year-olds back in the States? I imagine there would be hoots, catcalls, laughter, a few rude comments; and everyone would sit down and call for a movie. Of course, that is, if they had stood for the National Anthem in the first place.
Here, the 1,000 Soldiers continued to stand at attention, eyes fixed forward. The music started again. The Soldiers continued to quietly stand at attention. And again, at the same point, the music stopped. What would you expect to happen? Even here I would imagine laughter, as everyone finally sat down and expected the movie to start.
But here, you could have heard a pin drop. Every Soldier continued to stand at attention. Suddenly there was a lone voice, then a dozen, and quickly the room was filled with the voices of a thousand soldiers, finishing where the recording left off:
"And the rockets red glare,
the bombs bursting in air,
gave proof through the night
that our flag was still there.
Oh, say does that Star Spangled Banner yet wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave."
It was the most inspiring moment I have had here in Iraq . I wanted you to know what kind of Soldiers are serving you here. Remember them as they fight for you!
Wake Up America!
To understand this story, you need to know that, in military theaters, the National Anthem is played before every movie.
This was written by Chaplain Jim Higgins, who is stationed in Iraq:
I recently attended a showing of "Superman 3" here at LSA Anaconda (an American base camp north of Baghdad). We have a large auditorium we use for movies, as well as memorial services and other large gatherings. As is the custom back in the States, we stood and snapped to attention when the National Anthem began before the main feature. All was going as planned until about three-quarters of the way through The National Anthem the music stopped.
Now, what would happen if this occurred with 1,000 18-22 year-olds back in the States? I imagine there would be hoots, catcalls, laughter, a few rude comments; and everyone would sit down and call for a movie. Of course, that is, if they had stood for the National Anthem in the first place.
Here, the 1,000 Soldiers continued to stand at attention, eyes fixed forward. The music started again. The Soldiers continued to quietly stand at attention. And again, at the same point, the music stopped. What would you expect to happen? Even here I would imagine laughter, as everyone finally sat down and expected the movie to start.
But here, you could have heard a pin drop. Every Soldier continued to stand at attention. Suddenly there was a lone voice, then a dozen, and quickly the room was filled with the voices of a thousand soldiers, finishing where the recording left off:
"And the rockets red glare,
the bombs bursting in air,
gave proof through the night
that our flag was still there.
Oh, say does that Star Spangled Banner yet wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave."
It was the most inspiring moment I have had here in Iraq . I wanted you to know what kind of Soldiers are serving you here. Remember them as they fight for you!
Wake Up America!
Thursday, October 22, 2009
The Impersonators
This post is specifically intended for all of you who are holding steadfastly and resolutely to the ideal that the Republican Party is still the party for Conservatives. It Is Not! And while the Democratic Party has clearly defined it's niche on the far left of the political spectrum, that can not be said for the Republican Party. So I submit to you that the subtle ideology of those imposters masquerading as Republicans, in Washington specifically, but in lessor elected positions (like Governor) as well, portends that they are really just the right-wing arm of the progressive movement.
It is obvious to me that the Republican Party has been infiltrated by the progressive movement. And as soon as conservatives clinging to the label of "Republican" wake up to that fact, the better chance we have to create a conservative party that will represent our views, our principles, and our values. And the sooner we can begin the task of dismantling the socialist mechanism parasitically feasting on this country and surrounding & debilitating the systems, principles and values that made this country great.
So as we near the investigation stage of the 2010 elections, remember that the majority of Congressmen from both parties hold the same ideology - progressivism. They may differ slightly in degree, but, generally speaking, they are all progressive none-the-less. So what this administration starts, future administrations - led by either party - will continue. The two-party system is now just one entity - progressive government. We can only change it by forcing the Republicans to back conservative candidates (that's NOT going to happen), or we create a new party - a Conservative Party. What do you say America?
Wake Up!!!
It is obvious to me that the Republican Party has been infiltrated by the progressive movement. And as soon as conservatives clinging to the label of "Republican" wake up to that fact, the better chance we have to create a conservative party that will represent our views, our principles, and our values. And the sooner we can begin the task of dismantling the socialist mechanism parasitically feasting on this country and surrounding & debilitating the systems, principles and values that made this country great.
So as we near the investigation stage of the 2010 elections, remember that the majority of Congressmen from both parties hold the same ideology - progressivism. They may differ slightly in degree, but, generally speaking, they are all progressive none-the-less. So what this administration starts, future administrations - led by either party - will continue. The two-party system is now just one entity - progressive government. We can only change it by forcing the Republicans to back conservative candidates (that's NOT going to happen), or we create a new party - a Conservative Party. What do you say America?
Wake Up!!!
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
The Problem As I See It
Democrats and Republicans vs. Conservatives
The Democratic Party, encompassing every leftist radical, revolutionary wacko, liberal, socialist and communist, is as big as it's going to get for a while - they are just too far left and have known that for a long time. They continuously claim that the Republican Party is not inclusive enough. But, to ensure strengthening the pursuit of their agenda the progressives infiltrated the Republican Party, placing the less radical of their group in that body. Those individuals, McCain, Snowe, the Bushes and others also actively espouse that the Republican Party has to be more inclusive. That's why for the past several elections there hasn't been great choice between the final candidates. Let's face it, McCain or Obama? Gore or Bush? Bush 1 or Clinton? McCain and Joe Lieberman buddy, buddy. McCain calling Obama a "good man" during the campaign. Come on folks, that writing has been on the wall for a while. The last true conservative who ran for President was Ronald Reagan. And how did the country respond? They overwhelmingly voted him into office for two terms!! So is Conservatism dead like the radical democrat progressives and the less radical progressive Republicans will have us believe? I think - NOT. So why do they keep telling us that? To keep us down, that's why. But it's time for us all to stand up, take off our sweats and get in the game!
As I see it, the problem we have is still significant because if we can't get conservatives to run for office the ideological choices of the candidates available for us to vote on are progressive or radically progressive. And in both cases, the country continues to meander down the path to socialism. Don't let the party labels mislead you. There are just too many progressives populating both parties, for either of them to do us much good. And while there are still some good men and women in Congress, sadly there are just not enough. Don't be blinded come next November and vote the party - do your homework and vote the Conservative!
But where are the conservatives? Where are the people knowledgeable enough to begin a new party - the Conservative Party? Will new blood step up and take the mantle and the challenge of fighting for the country as she was created? I sure hope so. We have one such person here in Florida who is running for the Senate - Marco Rubio. If you're from Florida, get behind this guy!!
It's Time To Wake Up America!
The Democratic Party, encompassing every leftist radical, revolutionary wacko, liberal, socialist and communist, is as big as it's going to get for a while - they are just too far left and have known that for a long time. They continuously claim that the Republican Party is not inclusive enough. But, to ensure strengthening the pursuit of their agenda the progressives infiltrated the Republican Party, placing the less radical of their group in that body. Those individuals, McCain, Snowe, the Bushes and others also actively espouse that the Republican Party has to be more inclusive. That's why for the past several elections there hasn't been great choice between the final candidates. Let's face it, McCain or Obama? Gore or Bush? Bush 1 or Clinton? McCain and Joe Lieberman buddy, buddy. McCain calling Obama a "good man" during the campaign. Come on folks, that writing has been on the wall for a while. The last true conservative who ran for President was Ronald Reagan. And how did the country respond? They overwhelmingly voted him into office for two terms!! So is Conservatism dead like the radical democrat progressives and the less radical progressive Republicans will have us believe? I think - NOT. So why do they keep telling us that? To keep us down, that's why. But it's time for us all to stand up, take off our sweats and get in the game!
As I see it, the problem we have is still significant because if we can't get conservatives to run for office the ideological choices of the candidates available for us to vote on are progressive or radically progressive. And in both cases, the country continues to meander down the path to socialism. Don't let the party labels mislead you. There are just too many progressives populating both parties, for either of them to do us much good. And while there are still some good men and women in Congress, sadly there are just not enough. Don't be blinded come next November and vote the party - do your homework and vote the Conservative!
But where are the conservatives? Where are the people knowledgeable enough to begin a new party - the Conservative Party? Will new blood step up and take the mantle and the challenge of fighting for the country as she was created? I sure hope so. We have one such person here in Florida who is running for the Senate - Marco Rubio. If you're from Florida, get behind this guy!!
It's Time To Wake Up America!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Commander-In-Thief At It Again
What would the country look like if we were allowed to elect people not associated with the label Democrat or Republican? What if we just had to vote for Mr. Jones or Mr. Smith - no party affiliations? What do you think the outcome would be? Would more liberlas than conservatives be elected, or would it be the other way around? Here's an articlae that leads me to believe that the Democrats have thought that through, and that they need and use the Democratic label to lead people, specifically blacks by the nose to vote for them. Please read on...
Justice Dept: Blacks MUST Have Democrat Label to Know How to Vote
Posted By Bobby Eberle On October 20, 2009 at 9:02 am in The Loft
There have been some crazy actions to come from Obama and his advisors regarding race. Remember when, not knowing ANY of the facts regarding an incident between a white police officer and a black professor, Obama said on national television that the officer acted "stupidly?" Or how about Obama's 20-year affiliation with a pastor who blasts America and advocates racial division?
Well, now I think I've seen it all. Obama's Justice Department has ruled against the actions of the town of Kinston, North Carolina. What did this town do that was so terrible? The residents voted overwhelmingly to eliminate partisan elections for mayor and city council members. The Justice Department stepped in and said, "Whoa! Wait just a second!" According to the Justice Department, blacks in Kinston must have the Democrat Party in order to elect their "candidate of choice." How insulting! Basically, what Obama's team is saying is that blacks will only vote for Democrats, and without the party label, blacks can't figure out for themselves which candidate will get their vote. This is not only a slap in the face of the voters, but it continues Obama's efforts to divide people along racial lines rather than bring them together.
The Washington Times has an excellent accounting of what is happening in this small North Carolina city. Following a city vote to do away with partisan elections for city offices, the Justice Department blocked the action:
The Justice Department's ruling, which affects races for City Council and mayor, went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their "candidates of choice" - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black. The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters' right to elect the candidates they want.
Candidate of choice? Basically they are saying that blacks will ONLY vote for Democrats, and if there is no party label, they won't know what to do. Obama's team also continues to take steps backward in race relations. Saying that whites will only vote for a black if there is a party label attached smacks of blatant bigotry. Furthermore, to say that blacks can't figure out who their "candidate of choice" is without a party label, Justice Department officials are making a huge assumption about the intelligence of black voters.
First of all, if a person is running for office, and that person is the "candidate of choice" for a voter or group of voters, it doesn't matter if that candidate has a party label attached or not. Shouldn't the electoral process by a process where voters actually pay attention to issues, do a little research, and then make an informed decision? What the Obama folks are saying is, "Forget all that! We just want them to vote for the Democrat."
Justice Department spokesman Alejandro Miyar denied that the decision was intended to help the Democratic Party. He said the ruling was based on "what the facts are in a particular jurisdiction" and how it affects blacks' ability to elect the candidates they favor. "The determination of who is a 'candidate of choice' for any group of voters in a given jurisdiction is based on an analysis of the electoral behavior of those voters within a particular jurisdiction," he said. Critics on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights are not so sure. "The Voting Rights Act is supposed to protect against situations when black voters are locked out because of racism," said Abigail Thernstrom, a Republican appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. "There is no entitlement to elect a candidate they prefer on the assumption that all black voters prefer Democratic candidates."
Keep in mind that according to the news story, this city votes Democrat overwhelmingly... both blacks and whites. Kinston "voted by a margin of nearly 2-to-1 to eliminate partisan elections in the city."
The news story gets ridiculous when one reads the quotes from Loretta King, "who at the time was the acting head of the Justice Department's civil rights division."
"Removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office," she said.
Ms. King is the same official who put a stop to the New Black Panther Party case. In that case, the Justice Department filed a civil complaint in Philadelphia after two members of the black revolutionary group dressed in quasi-military garb stood outside a polling place on election last year and purportedly intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs and a nightstick.
Through King's efforts, the charges against all but one of the Black Panthers were dropped.
The Justice Department's actions are not only racial, but overtly political. As noted by Hans A. von Spakovsky at National Review Online:
The attorneys in the Voting Section also increasingly use the Voting Rights Act as primarily a political bludgeon to protect and enhance the electoral successes of the Democratic Party. Thus, in the Kinston objection letter, the Department stated that “it is the partisan makeup of the general electorate” that allows the winner of the Democratic primary to win in the general election. But of course, the VRA is supposed to protect voters, not majority parties. The fact that blacks are a controlling majority in the city is essentially deemed irrelevant.
This is yet another example of Obama's advisors showing that they are not ready for their duty to represent the entire country. They are partisans, and they are ideological radicals.
Wake Up America!
Justice Dept: Blacks MUST Have Democrat Label to Know How to Vote
Posted By Bobby Eberle On October 20, 2009 at 9:02 am in The Loft
There have been some crazy actions to come from Obama and his advisors regarding race. Remember when, not knowing ANY of the facts regarding an incident between a white police officer and a black professor, Obama said on national television that the officer acted "stupidly?" Or how about Obama's 20-year affiliation with a pastor who blasts America and advocates racial division?
Well, now I think I've seen it all. Obama's Justice Department has ruled against the actions of the town of Kinston, North Carolina. What did this town do that was so terrible? The residents voted overwhelmingly to eliminate partisan elections for mayor and city council members. The Justice Department stepped in and said, "Whoa! Wait just a second!" According to the Justice Department, blacks in Kinston must have the Democrat Party in order to elect their "candidate of choice." How insulting! Basically, what Obama's team is saying is that blacks will only vote for Democrats, and without the party label, blacks can't figure out for themselves which candidate will get their vote. This is not only a slap in the face of the voters, but it continues Obama's efforts to divide people along racial lines rather than bring them together.
The Washington Times has an excellent accounting of what is happening in this small North Carolina city. Following a city vote to do away with partisan elections for city offices, the Justice Department blocked the action:
The Justice Department's ruling, which affects races for City Council and mayor, went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their "candidates of choice" - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black. The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters' right to elect the candidates they want.
Candidate of choice? Basically they are saying that blacks will ONLY vote for Democrats, and if there is no party label, they won't know what to do. Obama's team also continues to take steps backward in race relations. Saying that whites will only vote for a black if there is a party label attached smacks of blatant bigotry. Furthermore, to say that blacks can't figure out who their "candidate of choice" is without a party label, Justice Department officials are making a huge assumption about the intelligence of black voters.
First of all, if a person is running for office, and that person is the "candidate of choice" for a voter or group of voters, it doesn't matter if that candidate has a party label attached or not. Shouldn't the electoral process by a process where voters actually pay attention to issues, do a little research, and then make an informed decision? What the Obama folks are saying is, "Forget all that! We just want them to vote for the Democrat."
Justice Department spokesman Alejandro Miyar denied that the decision was intended to help the Democratic Party. He said the ruling was based on "what the facts are in a particular jurisdiction" and how it affects blacks' ability to elect the candidates they favor. "The determination of who is a 'candidate of choice' for any group of voters in a given jurisdiction is based on an analysis of the electoral behavior of those voters within a particular jurisdiction," he said. Critics on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights are not so sure. "The Voting Rights Act is supposed to protect against situations when black voters are locked out because of racism," said Abigail Thernstrom, a Republican appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. "There is no entitlement to elect a candidate they prefer on the assumption that all black voters prefer Democratic candidates."
Keep in mind that according to the news story, this city votes Democrat overwhelmingly... both blacks and whites. Kinston "voted by a margin of nearly 2-to-1 to eliminate partisan elections in the city."
The news story gets ridiculous when one reads the quotes from Loretta King, "who at the time was the acting head of the Justice Department's civil rights division."
"Removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office," she said.
Ms. King is the same official who put a stop to the New Black Panther Party case. In that case, the Justice Department filed a civil complaint in Philadelphia after two members of the black revolutionary group dressed in quasi-military garb stood outside a polling place on election last year and purportedly intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs and a nightstick.
Through King's efforts, the charges against all but one of the Black Panthers were dropped.
The Justice Department's actions are not only racial, but overtly political. As noted by Hans A. von Spakovsky at National Review Online:
The attorneys in the Voting Section also increasingly use the Voting Rights Act as primarily a political bludgeon to protect and enhance the electoral successes of the Democratic Party. Thus, in the Kinston objection letter, the Department stated that “it is the partisan makeup of the general electorate” that allows the winner of the Democratic primary to win in the general election. But of course, the VRA is supposed to protect voters, not majority parties. The fact that blacks are a controlling majority in the city is essentially deemed irrelevant.
This is yet another example of Obama's advisors showing that they are not ready for their duty to represent the entire country. They are partisans, and they are ideological radicals.
Wake Up America!
Monday, October 19, 2009
I Believe...
I believe in God. I believe in miracles, because I have witnessed them in my own life. I believe that good will always triumph over evil, but I also believe that there will be set backs. I believe that America was the greatest nation that ever existed. But I also believe that she is just a shell of what she was and what I hope she could be again, and that we are at the turning point in history that will define what America becomes. I believe we will know definitively what she becomes during the second half of this century - maybe sooner. I believe that power corrupts, and that is why I also believe that term limits are necessary if we are to have any chance to save the Republic as she was created. I believe in the innocence of a child and the confidence of an adolescent, but I also believe in the arrogance of grown men. And while I admire the former, I detest the latter. I believe that friends and family are important, and that while you may lose friends over your lifetime, family is always family. I believe that good men fight bad wars and that their honor and integrity define their actions and their fate. I believe that if left unchecked, Barack Obama will irreparably change this country for the worse. I believe he has already created the foundation to accomplish that result, but I also believe that it is not too late to alter the course he has set for America. I also believe that we have to act now, and act boldly to stop his agenda. I believe that the ideology of socialism and communism is evil, and that we are truly in a fight against that evil, despite people telling me that Obama "is a good man" or that "he hasn't done anything yet". I believe in the goodness inherent in most Americans, and that those same Americans can be counted upon to fight for America in the next several election cycles, and if called upon to defend and or protect her will physically fight for her as well. I believe that conservatism is alive and well, and that progressives have hijacked the Republican Party and, like wolves in sheep's clothing are leading Americans to slaughter, and that America has not fully woken to that truth yet. But I also believe that she will. I believe that the Republican party no longer represents any portion of conservative America because they can no longer be trusted, and that a new party - the Conservative Party - must be created. I believe conservatives must be more watchful if this new party is created so that progressives don't infiltrate it as well. I believe that if you are still reading this, you too believe there is something wrong in America and that we are in danger as a people and a nation.
What do you believe?
Wake Up America!
What do you believe?
Wake Up America!
Saturday, October 17, 2009
NFL-izing America
While everyone is up in arms over the NFL/Rush Limbaugh flap, I have a different take on things. Maybe it's time we should re-evaluate our priorities as a nation, take a step back in time, and NFL-ize America. Let me explain.
Americans have watch silently for the past 25 years as Affirmative Action and Diversity have been pushed down our collective throats, enforced by the EEOC. We were told that we needed such social programs to help those less fortunate succeed in the workplace and educational facilities specifically, and in life generally. But all it really did was dumb down our kids and allow those less qualified to take jobs from those fully qualified. In the process, America has lost influence, strength, and their edge on the rest of the world. Heck, our currency solvency is rated #50 in the world! How did that happen? How many Presidents and Congresses are responsible for that?
But in the NFL you have none of that. During the draft the best player for the team's needs is always picked - regardless of race, class, looks, etc. And because of that the level of skill and competition, and the resulting performance of the players and teams have continued to increase over the years. Why can't we get back to that concept in the rest of America!! Let's pick the best person for the job, regardless of race, class, creed, etc - not someone less qualified because of some social agenda pushed on us by progressive lackeys looking to stealthily push their agenda on us all.
Wake Up America!
Americans have watch silently for the past 25 years as Affirmative Action and Diversity have been pushed down our collective throats, enforced by the EEOC. We were told that we needed such social programs to help those less fortunate succeed in the workplace and educational facilities specifically, and in life generally. But all it really did was dumb down our kids and allow those less qualified to take jobs from those fully qualified. In the process, America has lost influence, strength, and their edge on the rest of the world. Heck, our currency solvency is rated #50 in the world! How did that happen? How many Presidents and Congresses are responsible for that?
But in the NFL you have none of that. During the draft the best player for the team's needs is always picked - regardless of race, class, looks, etc. And because of that the level of skill and competition, and the resulting performance of the players and teams have continued to increase over the years. Why can't we get back to that concept in the rest of America!! Let's pick the best person for the job, regardless of race, class, creed, etc - not someone less qualified because of some social agenda pushed on us by progressive lackeys looking to stealthily push their agenda on us all.
Wake Up America!
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty - This Is As Serious As It Gets!
This was Posted by Nickie Goomba at Goomba News Network; Because of it's importance I have borrowed it to help spread the word through more outlets.
October 16, 2009
Cbullitt at Soylent Green has been acting as Paul Revere and notifying the Internet about this sobering story. Opus #6 has reposted it and I'm doing the same.
The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.
A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.
Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
[laughter]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.
But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.
So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:
Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!
Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:
Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.
I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.
Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -
I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.
I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?
I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.
Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.
Edited to add @ 8:31 am:
Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.
To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.
With Enforcement Authority (heading added)© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new center for information exchange [read; enforcement].
If you haven't yet, Wake Up America! Time is getting short!!!
October 16, 2009
Cbullitt at Soylent Green has been acting as Paul Revere and notifying the Internet about this sobering story. Opus #6 has reposted it and I'm doing the same.
The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.
A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.
Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
[laughter]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.
But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.
So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:
Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!
Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:
Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.
I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.
Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -
I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.
I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?
I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.
Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.
Edited to add @ 8:31 am:
Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.
To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.
With Enforcement Authority (heading added)© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new center for information exchange [read; enforcement].
If you haven't yet, Wake Up America! Time is getting short!!!
Friday, October 16, 2009
The Alliance Defense Fund
This is a group defending our liberty against the ACLU which has systematically and continuously attacked our Judeo-Christian system of values for 50 years. The ACLU prevents Christians from praying in schools - but Muslims can put down their little rugs and pray. Hmmm. They help to propagate homosexual teaching in grade school, but attack legal marriage between a man and a woman as the sole description of marriage. They condone abortion. They oppose "one Nation under God" in the pledge of allegiance. There is an assault on "In God We Trust" on our money. Check out the ADF and see if they're a group you can support.
Wake Up America!
Wake Up America!
Thursday, October 15, 2009
2010 - "A Teachable Moment"
Olympia Snowe is the lone Republican who voted for the Baucus Bill in the Finance Committee. The Bill passed 14-9, with all Democrats voting for it. Snowe is obviously a "wolf in sheep's clothing." So what we must try to remember is that political labels like Democrat, Republican and Independent mean little in today's world. We need to focus on who is conservative, who is liberal and who is progressive. If we continue to look to the "parties" as our salvation, we are doomed to fail in our quest to strengthen the Republic in terms of reinforcing the Constitution as it was written and the Bill of Rights.
For me, any national politician who has not voted conservative consistently, and those who have such disdain for the American public that they continue to vote against our wishes, must be the first casualties of this ideological war come 2010! And the battle must be intensified between 2010 and 2012 to make any real difference. But the true test will be how long conservative America, or at least center right America, can stay focused and engaged politically. Only through long-term engagement can the right take back the Supreme Court and Congress and start making significant change in the direction of the country.
Like the war on terrorism, the ideological war for America will not be a quick war. It will not be won in the next 2 or 4 years, or even 10. It may not be over in our lifetimes. But it is precisely because the left refuses to accept the terms "victory" and "win the war" or "fight to win" that the right will eventually win this fight. Because we DO believe in competition. We do believe in "number one". We do believe we are, and should be, the leader of the world. We do believe in VICTORY!
So let's make 2010 a Teachable Moment by voting out as many progressive/liberal ideologues as possible. Let's make 2012 a second Teachable Moment. And let's keep teaching that lesson election after election after election until we restore America to her former greatness!
We have started a noble movement to save America. Don't delude yourself into believing the course ahead will be easy, or that it will be quick. Start teaching your children, and their children, about what you are doing and why you are doing it. We will "write" our own history by doing so. And that history will be passed to our great grandchildren and their grandchildren, and America will endure and even flourish. We are all that stands between that vision and Obama's vision. There is no option but to win.
Wake Up America!
For me, any national politician who has not voted conservative consistently, and those who have such disdain for the American public that they continue to vote against our wishes, must be the first casualties of this ideological war come 2010! And the battle must be intensified between 2010 and 2012 to make any real difference. But the true test will be how long conservative America, or at least center right America, can stay focused and engaged politically. Only through long-term engagement can the right take back the Supreme Court and Congress and start making significant change in the direction of the country.
Like the war on terrorism, the ideological war for America will not be a quick war. It will not be won in the next 2 or 4 years, or even 10. It may not be over in our lifetimes. But it is precisely because the left refuses to accept the terms "victory" and "win the war" or "fight to win" that the right will eventually win this fight. Because we DO believe in competition. We do believe in "number one". We do believe we are, and should be, the leader of the world. We do believe in VICTORY!
So let's make 2010 a Teachable Moment by voting out as many progressive/liberal ideologues as possible. Let's make 2012 a second Teachable Moment. And let's keep teaching that lesson election after election after election until we restore America to her former greatness!
We have started a noble movement to save America. Don't delude yourself into believing the course ahead will be easy, or that it will be quick. Start teaching your children, and their children, about what you are doing and why you are doing it. We will "write" our own history by doing so. And that history will be passed to our great grandchildren and their grandchildren, and America will endure and even flourish. We are all that stands between that vision and Obama's vision. There is no option but to win.
Wake Up America!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
New Medical Symbol
The medical industry has created this new symbol to clearly illustrate what Health Care Reform, as currently being proposed, will mean to each and every one of us.
Wake Up America!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)