They Better Not Lose Their Nerve!

New Republic: GOP Will Impeach Obama

Thursday, 14 Oct 2010
If Republicans win control of the House, they will impeach President Obama, according to Jonathan Chait of The New Republic. “They won’t do it right away. And they won’t succeed in removing Obama -- you need 67 Senate votes,” Chait writes. “But if Obama wins a second term, the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office.”

As evidence, he cites Rep. Darrell Issa’s, R-Calif., remarks that the Joe Sestak scandal was an impeachable offense. The White House dangled a job possibility to Democratic Pennsylvania Senate candidate Sestak if he would withdraw from the primary against the White House’s favored candidate Arlen Specter. Sestak didn’t do it, and he beat Specter.

“Should Republicans win control of the House, Issa would bring his hair-trigger finger to the chairmanship of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee,” Chait writes. “The Sestak pseudo-scandal disappeared because there was no process to drive the story forward. Had Issa been running the Oversight Committee, it would have been the subject of hearings and subpoenas.”

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Beware the Green Dragon

Watch this video, then go to resistingthegreendragon.com to take a look at the site.


Resisting the Green Dragon full promo from Cornwall Alliance on Vimeo.


Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Mr. President, Congress, Can You Hear Us Yet?

Listen! Do you hear it? Do you hear the rumbling of thousands, perhaps millions, of feet trudging over the ground? Can you hear the soft whisperings of freedom being carried on the wind? The jingle of coins carried in pockets, as the masses prepare to move? The thunder of caravans and convoys as they traverse this great land? Listen well, Mr. President. Listen well, Senators and House Representatives. And heed what you hear...

 

Stand With God, Stand For Freedom!

A 1% Transaction Tax

Here's the Bill, and where it stands in the legislative process.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4646

On the surface, it may look like a good deal. Let's take a look...

If you make $4000.00 a month, are paid twice monthly, and have direct deposit, you will incur a tax of $40.00 every month for that deposit. If you write checks to pay monthly bills and expenses of $3000.00 you will pay an additional $30.00 of tax. If you take the remaining $1000 and transfer it to your savings account, you will incur another $10.00 tax. So on your $4000.00 per month income, you will pay $80.00 in tax.

Now the administration is going to try to sell this by telling you that the income tax will be "phased out" over the next 5 years. Do you really think that will happen? When they told us that we would incur an "income tax" of 1/2% on only the first $1400 of income in order to sell that tax, did they stick to their word? Probably the people who said it did, but subsequent administrations did not. Nor can we believe subsequent administrations will not renege on this "promise". 

And what about transactions in your 401K? Will they be affected? Yep! One day you gain, the next you lose, and all the while a "transaction fee" is being assessed. What a windfall for the government there, and a potentially substantial loss of retirement income over the course years for you.

The Bill is written to include this text:

IMPOSITION OF TRANSACTION FEE.

‘(a) In General- There is hereby imposed on every specified transaction a fee in an amount equal to 1 percent of the amount of such transaction.

‘(b) Specified Transaction- For purposes of this chapter--

‘(1) IN GENERAL- The term ‘specified transaction’ means any transaction that uses a payment instrument, including any check, cash, credit card, transfer of stock, bonds, or other financial instrument.

‘(2) TRANSACTION- The term ‘transaction’ includes retail and wholesale sales, purchases of intermediate goods, and financial and intangible transactions.

So not only are they looking to change the tax code to incorporate a national "sales" tax, they are also going after money unassociated with any sale, as described in the first paragraph of this post. Yeah, let's just open our wallets and give them free reign, and once we do, how long will it be before those "transaction taxes" are raised to 5%, 10% or 15%? The government knows no fiscal restraint. Taking our money without our consent must not be allowed. With a national sales tax, our consent is implicit when we decide to purchase something. With a "transaction tax" that is not the case.

I say yes to a national sales tax, or a flat tax, but no to a transaction tax!

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty

Saving Freedom

 

I suggest that if you'd like a look at where America is headed, and why, you pick up a copy of this book by Jim DeMint. There's some awfully good political insider insight into where we are, how we got here, what we're up against in terms of reversing our direction, and it's all written in a very readable style. Here are a few quotes from the book...

"Socialists are now marching under the banner of a new secular-progressive style of freedom; the freedom from responsibility, the freedom to behave destructively without moral judgement, the freedom from risk and failure, the freedom from want, the freedom from religion, and the freedom to have material equality with those who work harder and accomplish more."

"Few in America and in Congress would call themselves socialists. They believe they are liberals, progressives, Democrats, compassionate conservatives, moderate Republicans, or obedient religious adherents. They are good people with good intentions, and they would be deeply offended if anyone called them socialists. Yet they believe almost every need, cause, or activity should be supported, regulated, or controlled by the federal government. Their worldview is packaged with compassion, tolerance, fairness, and enough good intentions to 'pave the road to serfdom'."

"By the end of WWII, the country possessed nearly two-thirds of the world's gold reserves and more than half its entire manufacturing capacity. In 1947, the United States by itself accounted for one-third of world exports. It's foreign trade balance was comfortably in the black. As measured by value, its exports more than doubled its imports.The dollar had displaced the British pound sterling as the global reserve currency... Among the world's producers of oil, steel, airplanes, automobiles, and electronics, it ranked first in each category."

So what happened, you asked? Basically the sixty's and seventy's happened. We've had a negative trade balance every year since 1975!! Have you heard THAT before? It's all in the book. Along with a playbook to recapture our freedom, and possibly our greatness once again! Pick it up!

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Just Thinking...

I wonder how many "shovel ready" jobs will show up in the next two weeks in states where Dems are getting their butts handed to them?

Since the progressives have infiltrated both the Democrat and Republican Parties, and are hell bent on driving us towards socialism at least, where's the downside to voting for an O'Donnell, Angle, Whitman, McMahon, Fiorina or Miller?

When will we hear obama start spinning his first two years this way, "Doing what I did was the only way I could wake up America. I knew it would never fly, but it got the country engaged politically, and you've gotta admit, I woke 'em up. And we're better for it!"

Who will be the last RINO left in office when all is said and done?

Has the Democratic Party been unmasked enough, so that everyone knows it no longer represents a liberal segment of the country, but a socialist segment. And if so, are we seeing the end of that Party as we knew it? Will they rebrand themselves the Progressive Party?

How many people do you know personally who will end up NOT voting on November 2nd? Most of us would scream "NONE!" Let's hope we're not surprised.

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Mirror, Mirror

 

Maybe today, but certainly by November 1st, the Democrats will look in the mirror... and see Republicans staring back at them. That's where we stand politically. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are mere reflections of each other. When one party is in power, the other points in the mirror and says. "It's them!" And vice versa. For decades the progressive agenda has been advanced by both parties, and the "establishment" inherent in both parties, and the party machinery itself, is designed to distract every day Americans from seeing the truth. Well the truth is out. It has been exposed by the Tea Party, and all the citizens who have woken up to the things that movement has exposed.

We need to start teaching each other, and our children and grandchildren, that Party labels mean nothing in contemporary politics. What does matter is ideology. And you can choose from two, currently. Progressive or conservative. There seems to be no other option. If you choose anything but the conservative ideology, you are choosing to send the country further and further towards socialism. Because without a hard stand this group of progressives who run our government, our educational systems, and our media will not stand down. They will feel emboldened and empowered because people will have failed to take the necessary stand against them.

So it makes no difference what your political affiliation is. What really matters is in what direction do you want the country to move? If you consider yourself a liberal but still love your country and don't want to see socialism-lite, or socialism-pure at some point in the future, you owe it to yourself to vote as conservatively as possible in this election. There really is no other choice.

Do the right thing. Love your country. Honor the memories and lives of those who have died and sacrificed to give you a life in the greatest country on earth - possibly the greatest culture in history - by voting to keep the founding principles of the country intact. And don't abandon your responsibility to get out and VOTE in every election!

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

NOW YOU KNOW WHY MOST PEOPLE THINK CONGRESS ISN'T PERFORMING!

It's because our Government has been infiltrated by what has all the earmarks of a Communist Espionage Ring. - Commieblaster.com

http://www.commieblaster.com/progressives/index.html?v=zCaJ8uYEY1U

http://www.commieblaster.com/

There is a ton of useful information here! Check out your state, and see who's who in Congress - just in case you don't already know. Any wonder we're in the state we're in? And they keep duping us by playing one party against the other - while progressives RUN both. Start thinking along the lines of Conservative vs. Progressive. ASK anyone running for office where they stand in relation to the Constitution. If they won't answer, or they claim it is a "living" document - don't vote for them. They are required to take an oath, make sure you pin them down as to whether they believe in the oath they will be swearing to.

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Communist, Socialist, Muslim-Sympathetic

It really doesn't matter what term you use to describe obama. There are others, in addition to the three listed, which would describe him adequately as well. Using any one of them comes down to the same thing though - obama is anti-American, pure and simple. A fact clearly illustrated by his words and actions. Impeachment can't come quick enough for me. I trust the new Congress will look closely at that option come January.



Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Welcome To The "New" America

This is pretty unbelievable, but we are living in times America hasn't seen in centuries. America, Land of the Free? Still thinking that? Times are changing, and it has everything to do with government. And government is growing! Be wary! And be very, very scared.

LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

State snatches baby when dad accused of being 'Oath Keeper'
'You could be on 'the list' and then child protective services might come'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

A 16-hour-old newborn was snatched from her parents by authorities in Concord, N.H., after social services workers alleged the father is a member of Oath Keepers.

The organization collects affirmations from soldiers and peace officers that they would refuse orders that violate the U.S. Constitution, in light of what they perceive as the advance of socialism in the U.S.

The father, Johnathon Irish, told WND that the affidavit signed by Child Protective Service worker Dana Bicford seeking government custody of newborn Cheyenne said the agency "became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the 'Oath Keepers.'"

Irish, in an interview with WND, said officers and other social services workers ordered him to stand with his hands behind his back, frisked him and then took his daughter from him and his fiancé at Concord Hospital where the baby had been born.

He told WND that other issues cited by authorities included an allegation of child abuse, which he assumed pertained to an incident weeks earlier in which one of his fiance's older sons allegedly was struck by a babysitter.

He said both he and his fiancé had been cleared by authorities in that investigation.

Kathleen Demaris, a spokeswoman for the state agency, refused to comment.

Stewart Rhodes, the founder of Oath Keepers, expressed alarm when contacted by WND, describing the agency as a "chilling monster" that could "come get kids."

On his website, he confirmed the affidavit, along with other allegations, cites Irish's interest in Oath Keepers as a reason to separate the newborn from her parents.

"Yes, there are other, very serious allegations. Out of respect for the privacy of the parents, we will not publish the affidavit. … But please do remember that allegations do not equal facts – they are merely allegations," he said.

"But an even more fundamental point is that regardless of the other allegations, it is utterly unconstitutional for government agencies to list Mr. Irish's association with Oath Keepers in an affidavit in support of a child abuse order to remove his daughter from his custody," Rhodes said.

"Talk about chilling speech! If this is allowed to continue, it will chill the speech of not just Mr. Irish, but all Oath Keepers and it will serve as the camel [nose] under the tent for other associations being considered too risky for parents to dare," he continued. "'Don't you dare associate with such and such group, or you could be on 'the list' and then child protective services might come take your kids.'"

He noted that the state made no allegation that Oath Keepers is "criminal" or that Irish was committing a crime with his affiliation.

Oath Keepers posted a video by George Heminger, who identifies himself as an independent journalist, who was interviewing Irish by telephone:

Editor's Note: The recording is unedited and includes objectionable language.




"We are not advocating or planning imminent violence, which is the established line where free speech ends and criminal behavior begins," Rhodes continued said. "Neither is Oath Keepers a militia, for that matter. However, EVEN IF WE WERE, that also would not be a valid reason to take someone's child away. Private militias just like other voluntary associations, are not illegal, and it is not a crime to associate with them.


"To the contrary, we have an absolute right, won by the blood of patriots, and protected by our First Amendment, to freely associate with each other as we d--- well please so long as we are not advocating or planning imminent violent or directly harming our children (and no, teaching them 'thought crimes' like 'All men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,' or that those who swear an oath should keep it, does not count – at least not yet)," he said.

"A parent associating with a militia is not engaged in child endangerment and is not evidence of child endangerment," he said.

A promise

Oath Keepers' members promise not to obey any order "to disarm the American people," conduct warrantless searches, "detain American citizens as 'unlawful enemy combatants,'" work to impose martial law, invade or subjugate any state, blockade American cities, put Americans in detention camps or "make war against our own people."

That such circumstances could develop has been suggested by the government itself, in an earlier DHS document that cautioned about the possibility of violence from a variety of "extremists," a label that apparently now is being applied to Irish.

WND reported when a Department of Homeland Security report warned against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" and singled out returning war veterans as particular threats. The report characterized the extremists as people with concerns about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty.

The report, "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," dated April 7, 2009, stated "threats from white supremacist and violent anti-government groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts."

However, the document, first reported by talk-radio host and WND columnist Roger Hedgecock, went on to suggest worsening economic woes, potential new legislative restrictions on firearms and "the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks."

The report from DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis defined right-wing extremism in the U.S. as "divided into those groups, movements and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups) and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

Returning veterans

Most notable was the report's focus on the impact of returning war veterans.

"Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists," it said. "DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities."

In the Irish family situation, the father told WND that a court hearing is schedule Oct. 14. Until that time, he and his fiancé are ordered to have no contact with their daughter.

He described the state's accusations as "false allegations, fabricated allegations and unfounded fact."

Forum page participants at the Oath Keepers site were enraged:

"Make sure you tell this to everyone you know, if this is allowed, none of us with children are safe, is says the govt can take your children because of your affiliations with certain organizations!!"

"This is so scary!!! If they can do this, what next?"

"Be careful with this. The Republic has real enemies and some of them spend all their time sitting in their mom's basement thinking of ways to get us to overreact and make mistakes by which they can discredit us. This could be real, or it could be deliberate a disinformation tactic, a hard count to draw us offsides. Wait for full verification and full story details before doing anything we all might later regret," suggested another.

"Setting a chilling precedent and in a manner befitting the most tyrannical of regimes, the government seized a newborn baby girl today because the father has associated with the lawful, pro-peace, pro-constitution, anti-violence Oath Keepers. What makes this particularly scary is exactly that, that the 'Oath Keepers' is a peaceful, pro-rule of law organization which supports serving military, veterans, peace officers, and firefighters and reminds them of their oath to the Constitution of the United States in a direct and open manner."

Said Rhodes, "Now it is TIME TO PUSH BACK – peaceably, of course, using our voices and pens. Let the officials in question know that you strongly oppose their listing of an association with Oath Keepers as one of the reasons for taking this child. Let them know you insist that they remove that 'reason' from the affidavit and issue a public retraction, and until they do so, they will hear from all of us, and also from our legal counsel. And we won't relent until they respect our First Amendment protected rights of free speech and association and cease and desist this chilling of those rights. Be professional, but firm."

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

True (Red, White &) Blue, Patriotic, Unapologetic

And proud to be an American. No country has been perfect throughout their history, but none has been as compassionate and as giving - in terms of money, resources and lives - to help other nations in need, as America and her citizens have been. And none have given as much for the security of man's freedom around the world as we have given, and will continue to give. I hope you will stand with me as I declare that I do not apologize for America's imperfections; I celebrate her strength of character, her desire to ensure all men and women from all nations, whom God has created equal, have the opportunity to live free if they so desire, and her willingness to stand tall in the face of all adversity in pursuit of that worthwhile goal.

I believe in good and evil, and I believe that we are an inherently good nation. And on the scales that balance such things, history will show that despite the few who gladly and actively wish to tarnish our reputation around the world, and the apparent willingness of our government who, along with a small segment of our population, are willing to accept that portrayal, we are indeed the beacon of light that shines brightly around the world. But with that role, comes responsibility. So as we pursue our reclamation, and then our restoration, of a more Constitutional America filled with renewed levels of freedom and liberty, remember that our actions are being watched by millions, if not billions, around the world. And it is our actions that may well be the catalyst that drives other nations to defy their governments in pursuit of increased freedom and liberty in the decades to come. Once again, America will lead the way, because that's who we are.

Join with me and shout "We Are Proud To Be American!" And to all of you from all countries around the world who wish to be American as well, and who support us in your hearts and souls, join us as we battle the evil that has seeped into governments around the globe. Fight for Liberty!



Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

A Double Cross? It's Just Politics As Usual

Charlie "I'm not running as anything but a Republican" Crist may be up to no good. Two weeks after making that statement, because he couldn't win the Republican nomination against Marco Rubio, he changed his affiliation to Independent. For those of you who do not know, Crist hasn't been doing so well in the polls against Rubio even in that role. So now the question is, "Will Crist run as a Democrat?"

What is wrong with people who vote for chameleons like Crist? Endorsed by Jeb Bush when he was a Republican, he is now being endorsed by Democrat groups! WHO IS CHARLIE CRIST? Does anyone know? What does he stand for? What are his principles? Where is his honor? Who will he vote with, and what will he vote for?

No, my friends, politicians like Charlie Crist are EXACTLY why we are so engaged this year - we no longer need or want unprincipled, dishonorable, lying, hypocritical, finger-in-the-air-to-see-which-way-the-wind-blows, snakes running our government. Bye, Bye Charlie, grab your hat and don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out!

 A Florida Double Crist?

Kendrick Meek might drop out of the Florida senate race and thereby pave the path to victory for Charlie Crist.
By STEPHEN MOORE

TAMPA -- Republican leaders in the Sunshine State are fretting that a deal may be in the works to get Democratic nominee Kendrick Meek out of the Florida Senate race in order to boost Charlie Crist's flagging chances of beating Republican Marco Rubio.

Across the state, groups such as Palm Beach Democrats for Crist and Tampa Democrats for Crist are emerging. Republican fears are further stoked by the almost universal acknowledgment that Mr. Meek has almost no chance to win. Statewide polling has his support in the teens and falling. His money coffers are all but dry. Democrats had hoped that when Mr. Crist abandoned the GOP for an independent run, it would split the Republican vote and propel Mr. Meek into the winner's circle. With four weeks to go, no one believes that now. Mr. Meek, who is African-American, polls strongly only with black voters.

Meanwhile, Mr. Crist is striving to assemble a center-left coalition by winning over Democratic voters. His latest mailing throughout the state was titled "Ten Reasons Democrats Should Vote for Charlie Crist." On issues from health care to taxes, Mr. Crist has moved dramatically to the left.

.Mr. Crist has also refused to say which party he would caucus with if he wins. His latest nonanswer: "I will caucus with the people." But Mr. Crist has met privately with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, adding to GOP paranoia that Democrats may be getting ready to throw the sure loser Mr. Meek over the side. One Republican Party leader tells me he wouldn't be surprised to hear suddenly that "Meek was offered an ambassadorship from Barack Obama." In late September, under pressure from black leaders in Florida, Vice President Biden was sent to stump for the four-term House member, but local Democrats have long doubted the depth of the White House's commitment to the party's candidate.

Now the murmur among Democrats in favor of switching to Mr. Crist is rising again. We'll find out soon, as one GOP county chairman told me, whether Dems finally prefer "to win with Charlie than lose with Meeks."

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

See Any Similarities?

A friend of mine sent this to me. It's a short debate. The "regimes" of Atheism and the Progressive Movement, see any similarities between the two? And if so, where do you think it will lead?



Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

Crist Takes A Page Out Of Obama's Book

Yep, they both throw like girls! I expect to see Crist and Obama in skirts pretty any day now! Perhaps they should play for the same girls team? Can you say, "Get off the mound, Mary!"



Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!

One World, One Government - Is It Closer To A Reality Than We Know?

And who's really behind it? Maybe we're in a fight to save a country that is no longer savable? If true, isn't that sad? I'm not claiming anything specifically in this post, only hoping to open your mind to possibilities that you can ponder.

The concept and belief that secret societies exist has been a prevalent theme in many cultures (if not all) for centuries upon centuries. Elite groups like these The Bilderberg Group, The Skull & Bones Society, The Fabian Society, The Freemasons, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Tri-Lateral Commission, and The Illuminati among many others have drawn the imagination of millions upon millions (perhaps billions) of people worldwide. If they aren't plotting and planning for something extraordinary, why all the secrecy?

So is it possible that we are witnessing throughout the world the culmination of centuries of planning and process/systems indoctrination as the "one world order" rhetoric and the eventuality of "one world government" become more focused? And in fact become a reality? Are we in the end game of that movement?

And where does Scientology fall into the mix? That's a fairly recent phenomenon, and it's membership is surely elitists. Is there a mutual thread there? And lastly, more and more often we are told by people we would normally perceive as normal - pilots especially - that they have been witnesses to UFO's. Just recently an airport in China was shut down because of a "UFO" over that airport. In another report five
respected pilots confirmed their sightings of UFO's.

Is it possible that this group of secret societies have been working on their own military airforce for decades? God knows they have the money for such a project.  Do they have other weapons of which we are yet unaware? Is it impossible? If not, then think of the possibilities.

Oh, and where did thirteen trillion dollars disappear to from the Federal Reserve? Remember, that "entity" isn't audited by anyone. How is that possible? They print money - no one knows how much, we have to take their word for it - and they destroy money. What else do they do with it?

Here are just a few links to get you started in any research you might want to conduct on the subject of secret societies - there are many you haven't even heard of.



http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/secretsocietyindex.htm

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_brotherhoodsecretsocieties.htm

http://www.secretsocieties.net/

http://www.bcrevolution.ca/secret_societies.htm

Some of the stuff you'll find in these links is pretty scary, and provides a lot of ammo for the possibility of one or more conspiracies. More than ever...

Stand With God, Stand For Liberty!